Maof

Wednesday
Sep 23rd
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Рейтинг: 5 / 5

Звезда активнаЗвезда активнаЗвезда активнаЗвезда активнаЗвезда активна
 
Have you ever thought that, in the unfolding conflict between the Muslim world and the civilization, the Muslims behave much more logically than the West?

If I believe that you are unlawfully occupying, let's say, an island that's rightfully mine, I will send troops to that island. Their purpose will be to suppress any military resistance your army can offer, and re-establish my ownership over that piece of land. There is absolutely no need for me to target civilians in such a conflict: from any prospective, it would be not just immoral, but totally counterproductive vis-a-vis my goals in the conflict.

Jihad however is not about territories. It is about a way of life. If I wanted to destroy your way of life, going after your military installations would be largely futile, especially if your military might is a billion times greater than anything I can ever dream of. Your army, no matter how powerful, is only a tiny portion of your way of life. Blowing up an office building full of so called "innocent civilians" advances my cause much farther and much more convincingly (especially if it causes you to engage in soul-searching instead of exterminating me once and forever which you are perfectly capable of accomplishing) than killing the same number of military personnel, precisely because those civilians are the most important, irreplaceable components of the way of life I am trying to destroy. Their "innocence" is non-existent. The term is nothing but an absurd euphemism for their absurd inability to defend themselves. Think about it: how can an infidel be innocent? Isn't it an obvious contradiction in terms?

If you think I am being sarcastic, read the previous paragraph again: I am only trying to explain how the enemy's mentality is better suited for the conflict than ours.

During WWII, when the very survival of our civilization was in question (although not as acutely as it is now), the United States treated enemy civilians in a more reasonable manner than our current impotent, defeatist morality dictates. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed along with most of their 100% civilian population despite the fact that they had not a single military installation in either of them. As a result, Japan surrendered. As a result, lives of about a million American soldiers were spared, along with probably four or five times that many Japanese, most of them civilians. Conclusion: Japan should not have put the United States in a position where even humanitarian gestures would be so murderous for the Japanese.

In recent times, Israel is being daily penalized for killing Palestinian "civilians". Nothing can be more absurd, considering that "Palestinian people" didn't even exist until after the Six Day War, when that shameful misnomer was assigned to the largest and most successful terrorist organization in history. An Arab on the way to glorious martyrdom remains an unarmed civilian until he or she straps the explosives to his or her body. People who organize terrorist acts are considered unarmed civilians until their affiliation with a terrorist organization is proven, preferably in court. Women that lured 13 Israeli soldiers into a murderous trap in Jenin were perfectly unarmed civilians. Louis Farrakhan and his army are considered unarmed civilians. Mosques, those foreposts of Jihad spread around the United States and Europe, are considered off limits as religious institutions.

By the way, a religious cult requiring animal sacrifices would most probably cause wide spread protests and be eventually outlawed in this country. However, the religious cult that demands human sacrifices on the global scale -- conversion, enslavement, or extermination of all "infidel" everywhere in the world -- is respectfully classified as a "monotheistic religion" and "Abrahamic faith". In reality, it is Satan himself clumsily disguised as a saint.

We are doomed to destruction unless we start treating Islam the way we did Nazism. I am not calling for an anti-Muslim genocide: our decisive victory in WWII was achieved without exterminating the Germans. Instead, we exterminated Nazism. Today, we have no choice but to exterminate the most murderous ideology that has ever existed -- Islam.

I see many parallels between today's world and the situation at the beginning of WWII. With the sole exception of Great Britain, not a single government tried to oppose Hitler. If Hitler had not betrayed Stalin, the Soviet Union would've had no reason to oppose him either. Contrary to the popular myth, the United States did not enter the war to stop the Holocaust: they did it to prevent Stalin from going all the way to the Channel and creating the European Union a few decades prematurely.

Today, Muslims invade civilized countries under the benign guise of immigration. Their influence in Europe and even in the United States is growing steadily and will continue to do so unopposed until we finally wake up, although it's hard to tell if we're ever going to do it in time to save ourselves. Hypnotized by our own impotent dogmas, we stubbornly refuse to recognize the never-ending Arab war against Israel, the September 11, the war in Chechnya, the terrorist acts in various parts of the world for what they are: individual fronts of steadily growing Jihad, whose openly stated purpose is to destroy our civilization and establish the rule that would make Taliban look helplessly liberal. So far, they are winning.

Russian version