Jewish World Review July
18, 2006 / 22 Tamuz, 5766
The Middle East conflict is difficult to solve, but it is among the
simplest conflicts in history to understand.
The Arab and other Muslim enemies of Israel (for the easily confused,
this does not mean every Arab or every Muslim) want Israel destroyed. That
is why there is a Middle East conflict. Everything else is commentary.
Those who deny this and ascribe the conflict to other reasons, such
as "Israeli occupation," "Jewish settlements," a "cycle of violence," "the
Zionist lobby" and the like, do so despite the fact that Israel's enemies
regularly announce the reason for the conflict. The Iranian regime, Hizbollah,
Hamas and the Palestinians — in their public opinion polls, in their anti-Semitic
school curricula and media, in their election of Hamas, in their support
for terror against Israeli civilians in pre-1967 borders — as well as their
Muslim supporters around the world, all want the Jewish state annihilated.
In 1947-48, the Arab states tried to destroy the tiny Jewish state formed
by the United Nations partition plan. In 1967, Egypt, Syria and Jordan
tried to destroy Israel in what became known as the Six-Day War. All of
this took place before Israel occupied one millimeter of Palestinian land
and before there was a single Jewish settler in the West Bank.
Two months after the Six-Day War of June 5-10, 1967, the Arab countries
convened in Khartoum, Sudan, and announced on Sept. 1, 1967, their famous
"Three NOs" to Israel: "No peace, No recognition, No negotiations."
Six years later, in 1973, Egypt invaded the Israeli-held Sinai Peninsula,
a war that ended in a boost in Egyptian morale from its initially successful
surprise attack. Though nearly all of the Sinai remained in Israel's hands,
the boost in Egyptian self-confidence enabled Egypt's visionary president,
Anwar Sadat, four years later (November 1977), to do the unimaginable for
an Arab leader: He visited Israel and addressed its parliament in Jerusalem.
As a result, in 1978, Israel and Egypt signed a peace treaty in return
for which Israel gave all of the oil-rich Sinai Peninsula back to Egypt.
Three years later, in 1981, Sadat was assassinated by Egyptian Muslims,
a killing welcomed by most Arabs, including the PLO (Palestine Liberation
Organization). Why welcomed? Because Sadat had done the unforgivable —
recognized Israel and made peace with it.
The lesson that Palestinians should have learned from the Israeli-Egyptian
peace agreement was that if you make peace with Israel, you will not only
get peace in return, you will also get all or nearly all of your land back.
That is how much Israelis ache for peace.
Think about Israel for one moment: Israel is one of the most advanced
countries on earth in terms of culture (most books published, translated
from other languages and read per capita; most orchestras per capita, etc.);
major advances in medicine; technological breakthroughs; and decency as
a society, as exemplified by its treatment of its women, gays and even
its large Arab minority (particularly remarkable in light of the widespread
Arab and Muslim anti-Semitism and desire to annihilate Israel). This is
hardly a picture of some bloodthirsty, land-grabbing society. And Jews,
whatever their flaws, have never been known to be a violent people. If
anything, the stereotypical Jew has been depicted as particularly docile.
As a lifelong liberal critic of Israeli policies, the New York Times
foreign affairs columnist Thomas Friedman wrote just two weeks ago: "The
Palestinians could have a state on the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem
tomorrow, if they and the Arab League clearly recognized Israel, normalized
relations and renounced violence. Anyone who says otherwise doesn't know
Israel today."
Give Israel peace, and Israel will give you land.
Which is exactly what Israel agreed to do in the last year of the Clinton
administration. It offered PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat about 97 percent
of the West Bank and three percent of Israel's land in exchange for peace.
Instead, Israel got its men, women and children routinely blown up and
maimed by Palestinian terrorists after the Palestinians rejected the Israeli
offer at Camp David. Even President Clinton, desirous of being the honest
broker and yearning to be history's Middle East peacemaker, blamed the
ensuing violence entirely on the Palestinians.
Israel's Camp David offer of a Palestinian state for Palestinian peace
was rejected because most Palestinians and their Arab and Muslim supporters
don't want a second state. They want Israel destroyed. They admit it. Only
those who wish Israel's demise and the willfully naive do not.
If you don't believe this, ask almost anyone living in the Middle East
why there is a Middle East War, preferably in Arabic. If you ask in English,
they will assume you are either an academic, a Western news reporter, a
diplomat or a "peace activist." And then, they will assume you are gullible
and will tell you that it's because of "Israeli occupation" or "the Zionist
lobby."
But they know it isn't. And it never was.
Russian version