Jewish World Review May
25, 2007 / 8 Sivan 5767
Gracious as ever, Jimmy Carter says that when it comes to international
relations, the presidency of George W. Bush has set an all-time low. "I
think as far as the adverse impact on the nation around the world," Carter
told the Arkansas Democrat- Gazette last week, "this administration has
been the worst in history."
Former presidents don't usually insult their successors quite so overtly,
and Carter's slur, not surprisingly, drew international attention. Whereupon
he claimed that his remarks had been "maybe careless or misinterpreted"
and insisted: "I was certainly not talking personally about any president."
No, of course not.
If "Pot Calling a Kettle Black" were a category in the Guinness Book
of World Records, Carter would be a shoo-in for the upcoming edition. History's
ultimate judgment on Bush may not be known for some time, but its verdict
on Carter, who vacated the White House 26 years ago, seems clear enough.
And that verdict is: Well, let's just say he would be well advised not
to toss around phrases such as "worst in history" when the conversation
turns to presidential performance.
Christopher Hitchens this week recalled arguing with Eugene McCarthy,
a lifelong liberal who had voted for Ronald Reagan in 1980. McCarthy was
unapologetic. Carter, he said, "quite simply abdicated the whole responsibility
of the presidency while in office. He left the nation at the mercy of its
enemies at home and abroad. He was the worst president we ever had."
The worst of the 20th century, at any rate. During the Carter years,
America's international standing went into freefall. The 39th president
entered the White House as the tide in the Cold War was turning in the
Soviet Union's favor. Vietnam and Cambodia had fallen to the communists,
and Marxist governments had seized power in Mozambique, Angola, and Ethiopia
as well. Yet the new president went out of his way to dismiss principled
anticommunism as foolish paranoia: "We are now free of that inordinate
fear of communism which once led us to embrace any dictator who joined
us in that fear," he said 30 years ago this week. Instead of acting forcefully
to block any further expansion of communist power, Carter sought to appease
it.
Before long, he was slashing billions of dollars from the defense budget,
cancelling the B-1 bomber program, and ordering US missiles removed from
South Korea. He welcomed the Sandinista takeover of Nicaragua and provided
the junta with $90 million in aid. He initiated diplomatic relations with
Fidel Castro's dictatorship, unperturbed by the thousands of Cuban troops
fighting with Marxist forces in Africa. As Moscow engaged in a vast military
buildup and cultivated an international network of terrorists, the Carter
administration sliced hundreds of intelligence positions at the CIA.
Not until the Soviets invaded Afghanistan did the scales finally fall
from Carter's eyes. Moscow's naked aggression, he said, "made a more dramatic
change in my opinion of what the Soviets' ultimate goals are than anything
they've done in the previous time I've been in office."
Toward those who warned that American weakness was dangerously provocative,
Carter was scornful — "simplistic," he said of Reagan in October 1980,
"jingoistic . . . shooting from the hip." Toward tyrants and goons, on
the other hand, he was creepily unctuous. "A great and courageous leader"
who "believes in human rights" was Carter's description of Yugoslav dictator
Marshal Tito. To Romania's brutal Nicolae Ceausescu, the president fawned
: "Our goals are the same . . . to let the people of the world share in
growth, in peace, in personal freedom . . . in enhancing human rights."
His sycophancy in the face of malevolence was memorably captured in photographs
that showed him kissing Soviet ruler Leonid Brezhnev in 1979, a few months
before the invasion of Afghanistan.
Worse yet was the administration's supine response to the seizure of
the American Embassy in Tehran later the same year. When Carter hinted
that he might use military force to end the crisis and free the 52 US diplomats
being held in captivity, he was mocked by the Ayatollah Khomeini. "He is
beating on an empty drum," Khomeini sneered. "Neither does Carter have
the guts for military action nor would anyone listen to him."
The fruits of Carter's spinelessness, says scholar Steven Hayward, have
been bitter. The fall of Iran, he observes, "set in motion the advance
of radical Islam and the rise of terrorism that culminated in Sept. 11."
By doing nothing to prevent the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, Carter
invited an evil from which grew the jihadist violence that is such a menace
today.
It took Americans only four years to realize what a disaster Carter
had been; they booted him out in 1980 by a 44-state landslide. "The worst
in history," he says of Bush. Look who's talking.
Russian version