Maof

Saturday
Apr 20th
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Звезда не активнаЗвезда не активнаЗвезда не активнаЗвезда не активнаЗвезда не активна
 
How times change It was a different age. It was a different Israel. It was a different Israeli Labor party and a different Israeli Left.

May 5 was the 28th anniversary of the Maalot Massacre in northern Israel. The massacre followed only shortly after the Israeli Labor Party produced the debacle of the early stages of the Yom Kippur War, where Golda Meir and Moshe Dayan chose to ignore all warnings that the Arabs were about to attack and refused to mobilize the reserves.

But it was still a different Israel Labor Party from that of Ehud Barak and Shimon Peres. It was a Labor party dedicated to building settlements all over the "occupied territories" to prevent any talk of Palestinian statehood. It was a Labor party that was, at most, willing to consider a compromise deal with Jordan for the West Bank within the framework of the "Allon Plan." It was a Labor party that refused to recognize the Palestinians as a "people" and which criminalized even holding a chat with Arafat and the PLO.

It was also a different Israeli Left. In the entire country there were only a handful of "army service resisters," and they were members of the Maoist extremist group Matzpen. A group of Matzpen members were later arrested for espionage for Syria. The only politician speaking about anti-Zionism was Uri Avnery, and he got elected to the parliament as a kind of national spoof — on the basis of his semi-pornographic Olam Hazeh magazine — a sort of Israeli Larry Flynt.

Even the Israeli campus Left refused to have anything to do with the PLO or Fatah. True, the week before the massacre, Hebrew University's leftist newspaper was calling for conducting talks with the Marxist Popular Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine, the PDFLP. But even this student Left knew nothing could be expected from the Islamist fascists of the PLO, insisting that, as good Marxists, we could all collaborate with Palestinian Marxists like Naif Hawatme of the PDFLP for some joint class struggle.

In 1974, more Israeli Arabs voted for the "Zionist" political parties than for the Stalinist Fascist party, then named RAKACH and today known as HADASH. And even the RAKACH vote was little more than symbolic protest — not open identification with PLO terrorism.

On May 5, 1974, terrorists from the PDFLP, the very group the campus Left had been promoting, infiltrated Galilee from their bases in Lebanon and took over a school in Maalot where students on an annual trip were staying. They held the students and some teachers hostage, and demanded that Israeli release three Palestinian terrorists in exchange for the complete release of all hostages.

It was a different country. Golda Meir ruled out any negotiations with terrorists — knowing the risks, but also knowing that any capitulation to the terrorists would mean an endless string of future atrocities. Though the country was still in trauma from the October War, she ordered the army to retake the school. Twenty-three children and five adults were massacred by the terrorists. Of these, some were in fact killed by Israeli bullets in the firefight. But no one — not even the Left — placed the blame for these deaths on any doorstep but that of the terrorists.

But, years later, the same Israeli Labor party was to decide that the only way to deal with terror is to reward it, to capitulate to it, and to put thousands of terrorists on the street and arm them with Israeli weapons — to pursue self-debasement and auto-annihilation. Labor leaders even invited several of the leaders of the PDFLP, the organization that massacred the Maalot children, to move to the West Bank and participate in "peace" negotiations with Israel. The country that had been created in the name of "Never Again" was now rewarding Palestinian Nazis.

And today, in 2002, the most "hawkish" prime minister in Israeli history — head of the Likud — sets Arafat free to show the world that Israel is afraid to to fight terrorism, because in their case it might upset Bush's plans. President Bush wants a docile Israel, one that won't interfere with his attempt to create a fa?ade of Arab endorsement for his plans to attack Iraq. Quite a different age.


Mr. Plaut is a professor at the University of Haifa.

May 9, 2002, 8:45 a.m. http://www.nationalreview.com/
An introduction to MAOF
Haim Goldman

Dear Friends,

Would you believe that the undersigned has anything in common with

-- Professor Victor Davis Hanson (Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University),
-- Dr Charles Krauthammer, (Washington Post, Time, The Weekly Standard),
-- Caroline Glick (Deputy Managing Editor of the Jerusalem Post),
-- Jonathan Tobin (Executive Editor of the Philadelphia Jewish Exponent).

Amazingly, the editors of the MAOF website decided that the missives of the undersigned are worthy of translation and posting along the articles written by these distinguished authors.

The first letter was published without the consent of the undersigned.
However, after thorough examination of the laudable attitude of MAOF and of the excellent contents of the website, the undersigned had most graciously granted his permission for publication of his missives in both English and Russian.

“Analytical Group MAOF” [1] is an organisation founded about ten years ago by Russian-speaking Jewish intellectuals. The attitude of MAOF is definitely pro-Zionist -- unambiguously and unapologetically.

One of MAOF’s primary purposes is providing information and analysis about Middle-Eastern and world affairs as well as about Israel’s history, values and dilemmas. In addition to extensive publication activity in various media, MAOF also organises excursions and seminars. While the vast majority of the contents of the MAOF website is in Russian, texts originally written in English are provided in the original [2] as well as in Russian.

There are arguably about 250 millions of Russian-speakers worldwide and many of them do not read English. The indisputable motivation for the author’s permission was to grant those millions of disadvantaged people the grand benefit of reading the author’s ruminations. If the author is ever maliciously accused that his tacit motivation for authorising the publication was his craving to be listed along with the above-mentioned distinguished writers, his plea will definitely be “nolo contendere”.

The editors of MAOF expressed their gratitude by granting the undersigned a privilege that no other author got – the opportunity to review and correct the Russian translation before publication. The original letters of the undersigned are at [3] and their Russian version is at [4]. At of today, only two letters are posted but several other letters are pending translation.

You are kindly ENCOURAGED TO RECOMMEND the MAOF website to your friends and colleagues worldwide, particularly those who speak Russian. Those who do not enjoy the benefit of proficiency in the exquisite Russian language can find many thought-provoking and inspiring articles about Middle-Eastern and world affairs in the English section [2].

Sincerely,

Haim Goldman
28.10.2006

REFERENCES:

[1] http://maof.rjews.net
[2] section.php3? sid=37&num=25
[3] authorg.php3? id=2107&type=a
[4] authorg.php3? id=2166&type=a