Vladimir Jabotinsky was one of the greatest Jewish statesmen of the
twentieth century. His life is the portrait of an extraordinary if not
miraculous
personality, a man of impeccable character: truthful and wise,
modest and magnanimous, fearless and compassionate, and wholly dedicated
to the
welfare of the Jewish people.
Jabotinsky,
who died in 1940, was a philosophic-statesman. His words remind us
of the wisdom and humor of Abraham Lincoln. To read
this unsurpassed orator—who could address and inspire audiences in
seven different languages—is an experience that cannot but encourage any
sensitive soul, Jewish or non-Jewish. That such a man lived in
this era of mediocrity suggests that greatness is still possible.
Jabotinsky nobly and tirelessly sought
to overcome the “Jewish” obstacles to a Jewish renaissance, the foundation
of which, he saw, has to
be the Torah. For years he tried to reform the Jewish Establishment
from within. He was opposed by Chaim Weizmann, President of the Zionist
Organization, who genuflected to Great Britain. He had to contend
(and was vilified) by the Jewish Agency, whose chairman David Ben-Gurion,
was a self-professed Bolshevik. Both Weizmann and Ben-Gurion
passively accepted England’s renunciation of the Balfour Declaration and
went so
far as to say that a Jewish State is “undesirable”!
And so Jabotinsky formed the New Zionist
Organization. He also founded the Irgun, which saved the lives of
thousands of “illegal”
immigrants to Israel. Indeed, according to Winston Churchill,
it was the Irgun that drove the British out of Palestine. Hence one
may reasonably
conclude that Jabotinsky deserves no less credit than Ben-Gurion for
Israel’s rebirth.
To appreciate Jabotinsky’s penetrating
mind, let me quote and paraphrase as well as update some of his remarks,
interspersed by those of
his gentile admirer, British MP Josiah Wedgwood.
Jabotinsky: “It has been said that
the Jew learns not by way of reason but from catastrophe. He won’t
buy an umbrella merely because he
sees clouds in the sky. He waits until he is drenched and catches
pneumonia.” The present writer would add: Today, countless
Jews in Israel are
unknowingly afflicted by walking pneumonia, as well as by politicians
without chests!
Contrast Wedgwood: “We like people
who fight, even though we think they are entirely wrong … The Arabs stand
up and fight, and
massacre. Make no mistake, they have killed as many of their
own people as they have Jews, and they are murderers. On the other
hand, the Jews
are always complaining and begging for justice. That, of course,
is the result of 1800 years of servitude. For 1800 years they have
been dependent
on the good graces of governments and never on their own right arm,
and therefore they have the attitude which instinctively antagonizes every
Englishman … The attitude of supplication, of living on your knees,
has had a very bad effect among the respectable nations with the Jews.”
Returning to Jabotinsky: “[The
Jew in Israel] has the appearance of the character in Andreyev’s play:
“The man who was always being
slapped.” To this one might add: Israel is the only truly Christian
nation on earth: It is constantly turning the other cheek.
Again Wedgwood: How would this
gentile Zionist regard Jewish politicians who, while intoning the mantra
of peace, shake hands with a
murderous villain like Yasir Arafat? Such self-abasement, to
use Wedgwood’s language, “will stink in the nostrils of posterity.”
Jabotinsky would agree. But for
the Jewish people as a whole he would say: “What else can you expect
from a people who for decades
had it drummed into their heads that the only sacred thing is [peace];
that ideas and blood—the ideas and blood [required to establish a and preserve
Jewish State]—are nothing; that the only eternal values consists of
things you can photograph and touch. Now we shall see the moral results
of such
education. It will not be ordinary cowardice; it will be a conscious,
a reasoned, a boastful cowardice.”
The craven character of Israel’s secular
leaders may be contrasted with the fatuous character of certain religious
Jews, as this Jabotinsky
anecdote indicates. Two beadles from two synagogues are
discussing a terrible pogrom descending on their community. (Substitute
the disasters of
the Oslo Agreement.) One beadle says: “Have you done anything?”
The other replies: “Nothing. What can we do?” “What do
you
mean—nothing? You good-for-nothings! As soon as we heard
of what was about this calamity we stayed at the synagogue all night and
read
prayers and lamentations. Do you think we’ll just allow these
things to happen?”
Finally, this teaching of Jabotinsky:
“What is important is what you are demanding; what is important is in whose
name it is being demanded.
If the demand is presented in the name of a great mass of people, it
is important that that mass itself make it clear from time to time that
it is
seriously interested in the subject. What is important is patience
and stamina; and one of the most important factors is that the spokesman
stating the case should be capable of stating it clearly as well as
politely.” Yes, and fearlessly abiding by his word!
Israel’s desperately needs a Jabotinsky-like
alternative to its present leaders. The Foundation for Constitutional
Democracy is
inaugurating a program to educate future Jewish statesmen.
The Alliance of Jewish Young Adults
Presents ….
“Jewish Statesmanship:
Leadership for Young Adults’
A six-part lecture series by
Prof. Paul Eidelberg
Lecture #1:
‘How to preserve Israel as a Jewish State’
Thursday, December 12, at 8:00 PM
Location: The OU Israel Center
22 Keren HaYesod St.
Jerusalem
Free for students
10 Shekels for new Olim
For information call: 056-305549 or
e-mail” Адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. Для просмотра адреса в вашем браузере должен быть включен Javascript.
Russian versia