On August 17, 1990, before the outbreak of the
Persian Gulf War, a most revealing article appeared in HA'ARETZ.
The author, MK Yossi Sarid. Mr.Sarid referred to a poll which indicated
that 62 percent of Israel’s Arab citizens supported Saddam Hussein despite
his threat to incinerate Israel.
The poll was taken by a Jewish pollster, which
suggests that far more than 62 percent of these Arabs supported the Iraqi
dictator .
Nevertheless, Mr. Sarid seems to have been surprised
by this lack of patriotism on the part of Israel's Arab citizens.
Why? Surely he was aware of the fact that Arabs are exempt from military
service for security reasons. Surely he was cognizant of the report
of Israel's internal security service that in 1988 and 1989, that is, before
Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, Israel’s Arab citizens committed 442 politically
motivated assaults including stabbings, shootings, arson, and sabotage.
What is more, the report indicated that Arab terrorist cells within Israel's
pre-1967 borders were working with PLO counterparts in Judea and Samaria.
In view of these facts, it is criminally irresponsible
for members of the Barak Government to attribute the Israel Arab riots
of the past week to a few “extremists.” As the Arab pogroms of the
1920s and 30s clearly indicate, latent hatred of Jews is widespread among
Arabs, and this hatred can readily be ignited by their leaders. Those
pogroms were not
expressions of Arab grievances about “inequality.”
The issue was not economic, as socialists (and even capitalists) are wont
to believe, but religious or ideological. Indeed, it is an
insult to Arabs to think they can be bought, that they will renounce their
inherent religious animosity toward Israel for potage
If proof is wanted, the British Peel Commission report
of 1937 noted that, "Although the Arabs have benefited from the development
of the country owing to Jewish immigration, this has had no conciliatory
effect. On the contrary, improvement in the economic situation in
Palestine has meant the deterioration of the political situation."
There is only one way to deal with Arab violence,
and that is with overwhelming force. Unfortunately, Prime Minister
Ehud Barak, Israel’s most highly decorated soldier, does not seem to have
the stomach for sucha course of action. This being the case, he should
be called upon to resign.
Failing this, he should be removed from office
by an immediate vote of no confidence.
Admittedly, the formation of a national unity government
seems to be a plausible alternative. However, Barak would remain
prime minister, which means that his arrogance, along with party rivalry,
will lead to governmental paralysis. On the other hand, if the Likud
should agree to a government of national unity, it should do so under two
conditions:
(1) immediate suppression of Arab violence;
(2) elections at the earliest possible moment, which
means an election campaign of not more than two weeks duration.
Needless to say, a new government will have
to pursue a new agenda.
Above all, it will have to be a JEWISH agenda.
The agenda will be found in the program of the Yamin Israel Party.
The question is: Does Israel have a Prime Minister for such a program?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe to this mailing list, please send
a blank message to:
Адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. Для просмотра адреса в вашем браузере должен быть включен Javascript.