Those seeking
to identify a date for the commencement of the ruthless Muslim
extremist campaign against America, should forget September 11, 2001.
There is a
far better candidate for that distinction. October 23, 1983 stands
as America's
first day of post World War 2 infamy. That was the morning Hezbollah
guerillas
ended the lives of 241 Marines and over 70 French soldiers at the Beirut
barracks of the multi-national peace-keeping forces in Beirut. The
event claims
its mark on history on two counts. It was the first time a Muslim extremist
group had caused mass casualties against a U. S. target. It was also
the first
time since the Second World War that a U.S. military force had failed
to seek
retribution for a mass attack against American servicemen. Acting under
a
cautious warning from Caspar Weinberg, Ronald Reagans' Secretary of
Defense, the
Administration rejected retaliation against Hezbollah so as not to
threaten a
shaky relationship with Saudi Arabia. Instead, American forces were
quickly
recalled from Lebanon.
The failure to launch any significant reprisal against this slaughter
of
American peace keepers, coupled with the hasty retreat was to have
catastrophic
repercussions. Emboldened by its success, Hezbollah's power and prestige
in
southern Lebanon was greatly enhanced. In the nest five years it consolidated
its political control over southern Lebanon and took pride in the harassment
of
the Israeli forces lodged in the 14 mile security zone the Israelis
had created
following their 1982 invasion. From 1983 through 1992 the Israelis
suffered 49
suicide attacks by Hezbollah guerillas. Israel's hasty withdrawal in
May 2000,
mimicking the earlier U.S. retreat, only confirmed what many Muslim
extremists
had concluded 17 years earlier: neither the Israeli nor American military
machines had the stomach for mass losses or for combating the threat
of suicide
bombings.
For the past twenty years Hezbollah, strengthened by support from the
Iranian
mullahs and given freedom of movement by the nominal rulers of Lebanon
in Syria,
was able to become the virtual government of Southern Lebanon. In doing
so it
began the development of an international network of financiers and
fund raising
operations that created a steady flow of both arms and cash into southern
Lebanon. Quietly Hezbollah became the model and inspiration for all
extremist
Muslim factions both Sunni and Shiite.
It should therefore come as little surprise that investigations into
the
Paradise Hotel bombing and the attack on the Arkia plane in Mombassa
are
pointing to the strong possibility of joint operations between Hezbollah
and
al-Qaida.
In fact a clear pattern is emerging that suggests Hezbollah is actively
cooperating with al-Qaida. Osama Bin Laden was apparently impressed
enough with
the devastating attacks Hezbollah conducted in Lebanon and Argentina
(where it
has been fingered as the prime suspect in the 1993 bombings of the
Israeli
embassy and Jewish Community Center in Buenos Aries) that it adopted
similar
methods against American facilities in Dharhan in 1996, the U.S embassies
in
Tanzania and Kenya in 1998 and against the USS Cole in 1999.
Western intelligence has now revealed a high level of cooperation between
Bin
Laden and Imad Muganiyeh, the Hezbullah terrorist who masterminded
some of
Hezbollah's most spectacular atrocities and kidnappings in Lebanon.
Reports have
Muganiyeh first meeting with Bin Laden as early as 1995 and those meetings
have
continued.
More than this, since al-Qaida fled Afghanistan at the end of last year,
the
Sunday Telegraph reports, between 80 and 100 al- Qaida fighters were
provided
with false passports by Hezbollah before being relocated to southern
Lebanon,
Saudi Arabia and Yemen. The same report acknowledges that Hezbollah,
working
hand in hand with al-Qaida, has set up cells in the Far East including
Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, the Philippines and Singapore. It is
well known
that Hezbollah has operated in Gaza and the West Bank for years, but
the recent
revelation by the Shin Bet in Israel that al- Qaida has now also joined
them
there, is chilling evidence of a level of cooperation previously unsuspected.
Such news comes as a dire warning to American, Israeli and Jewish communities
throughout the world. A world wide campaign of destruction, linking
two of the
most fanatical and murderous terrorist operations on earth should be
of grave
concern to all who understand the war against terrorism as a world
war, ablaze
with all the lethality of the conflagrations that preceded it. While
Iraq
certainly presents a menace to world peace, we ignore the growing relationship
between al-Qaida and Hezbollah at our peril.
Yet there are signs that some American leaders are starting to get it.
Senate
Intelligence Committee Chairman Sen. Bob Graham, told CNN in November
that the
U.S. should launch attacks on Hezballah and Hamas headquarters and
training
camps. Graham said the U.S. made a major mistake in the 1990s when
"al Qaeda was
training hundreds, if not thousands of people in the skills of terrorism
in
those camps in Afghanistan. We had the capability to take those camps
out. We
chose not to do so." Committee Vice Chairman Sen. Richard Shelby added,
"Hezbollah and some others are probably the A team, not the B team
or the C
team, as far as potential terrorist threats to this country. The U.S.
must start
planning to take out Hezbollah before they take us out."
Therefore in a post Saddam world, bringing down Hezbollah, whose headquarters
and whereabouts is no secret, should become the American military's
number one
priority. Operating in conjunction with the IDF, the Hezbollah operation
in
Southern Lebanon must be brought to its knees, its operatives throughout
the
world identified and eliminated, its financial network dismantled.
Syria and
Iran must be threatened with reprisals for their continued financial
and
strategic support of Hezbollah and Saudia Arabia should be made to
pay the
diplomatic price for its double-faced attitude to the war on terror.
Pursuing al-Qaida may well slake a justified American thirst for revenge.
But
eliminating that organization's progenitor and model may, in the meantime,
be
just as effective in delivering a message to all Muslim extremists
that the
American government failed signally to convey 19 years ago.
Avi Davis is the senior fellow of the Freeman Center for Strategic
Studies http://freeman.io.com/index.htm.
Russian versia