US Senator Joe Lieberman recently was in Israel. He's been here on
pro-Israel visits before. But, this time it
was different. This time it sounded like the traditional 'I'm putting
my
hat in the ring to make my run for the
Whitehouse' sort of visit. Senator Lieberman wanted to be 'evenhanded'
so he also visited in Ramallah with
Palestinian officials, but not with Yasser Arafat. He said in an
interview on Israel Radio (Dec 23), that
Congress supports the establishment of a Palestinian state. But, what
concerns me most is that I heard him say,
"The conflict between people here will only end with a two-state
solution, a strong and peaceful Israel living
next to a strong and peaceful Palestine."
A STRONG AND PEACEFUL PALESTINE?
Has a more warped oxymoron been thought of? If Palestine is STRONG,
why
pray tell would they be Peaceful? Does
he hear the Palestinian opinion surveys that range from 40-80% support
for continuing the 'Intifadah' (i.e.
armed conflict with Jews), including continued suicide bombings? If
Palestine wants to be PEACEFUL, it doesn't
need to be STRONG, but simply to live, work, and do business with
Jews/Israelis, just like PEOPLE do all over
the civilized world.
Senator Lieberman might be a Connecticut Yankee and a proper gentleman,
but he needs to understand that this is
not the Mid-West, but the Mid-East. Here, strength means power,
and
power is used to further your cause and/or
protect yourself from your enemies.
What enemies do the Palestinians have? The Egyptians? The Jordanians?
Certainly not Israel, who since the early
1990's has systematically attempted to force PEACE (i.e. give them
territory), on to a population group (the
Arabs) who are still in the middle of violent revolutionary fervor,
wanting desperately to militarily vanquish
its enemy (Israel). No other rational explanation for Arafat's rejection
of Barak's peace offer, and then,
starting the Oslo War, makes sense. PEACE itself isn't good enough
for
Arafat and the Palestinians; they need
it after having achieved a military victory over Israel. And if they
do
'beat' Israel, why would they offer it
PEACE? A STRONG Palestinian state will only use its strength to fend
off
PEACE overtures from Israel or further
their cause, to 'liberate' all of Palestine.
Joe Lieberman for president in 2004?
When he ran for vice-president with Al Gore in 2000, many in the Jewish
community and in Israel quietly
questioned, "Will it be good for the Jews?" No doubt about it,
Senator
Joe Lieberman has been a good friend of
Israel through the years. But, being a friend does not prevent you
from
making bad policy decisions. The
tragedy of the Oslo Process (which brought the current war on us)
occurred during former president Bill
Clinton's watch. Clinton was hailed as the 'best friend' of Israel
in a
long time (during the 1990's), yet he
brought 'SHALOM', a real 'CHAVER'. History proves again, 'the road
to
hell is paved with good intensions'.
The basic rule (historically speaking) has been, that if a Jew is able
to rise up the power ladder in a gentile
country, he has to be assimilated to gentile culture enough to be
'non-threatening' to the power elite of that
host society. I'm not questioning Joe Lieberman's level of personal
religious observance, for example, Kosher
and Sabbath observance (he claims to be orthodox). But since the
beginning of the Zionist Revival, Judaism has
reclaimed the National aspect to Torah observance as well. Having a
government, army, building towns and
villages, and planting trees and vineyards, in the Land of Israel,
are
all the fulfillment of Mitzvot
(religious precepts).
What concerns me is an American Jewish President willing (as have been
Israeli Prime Ministers), to give up
parts of the ancient Jewish homeland to foreigners (the Arabs). An
American Jewish President willing to create
a 'Palestinian State'. This President, unlike Bill Clinton or George
Bush, will probably tell us that as 'a
religious Jew' he 'knows' that Judaism holds PEACE as the highest value,
and that its acceptable to give up
claims to parts of our 'Holy Land' for the promise of PEACE. We've
all
seen where the 'peace process' has taken
us, over 700 killed and over 5,000 injured in just the last 2 years
alone.
Forget the fact that Jews yearned for 2,000 years to return to their
Promised Land and re-establish national
life as an independent nation living in its own homeland. Forget the
fact that control over the Land is the
fulfillment of a religious precept (Nachmanidies' explication of Jewish
Law on this is undisputed). Forget the
fact that giving up territory and further claims to it, are a retreat
from that observance.
What's most important is America's global agenda, which includes a
pacified Middle East, i.e. an Israel willing
to trade its Patrimony for the promise of PEACE. What's most important
is to be 'even-handed' between Israel
and the Palestinians. What's most important is the glory gained for
an
American President, the first Jewish
president, to bring that peace to the region. He will do it to Israel
for its own good, because he is Israel's
friend.
And what kind of Peace will it be? A "Strong and Peaceful Palestine."
What a nightmare!
Ariel Natan Pasko is an independent analyst & consultant. He
has a
Master's Degree in International Relations &
Policy Analysis. His articles have been published on numerous
news/views and think-tank websites, in
newspapers, and can be read at: http://www.geocities.com/ariel_natan_pasko/
(c)2003/5763 Pasko
Russian version