Maof

WINSTON MID EAST ANALYSIS & COMMENTARY  January 12, 2003    Email: Адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. Для просмотра адреса в вашем браузере должен быть включен Javascript. Please disseminate & re-post. If you publish, send us a copy. Please see our web site at http://www.gamla.org.il/english & http://www.freeman.org

CAVEAT: As in all nations, most of the English do NOT carry the virus of anti-Semitism, however:

It took Pharaoh numerous signals, culminating with the death of all Egypt’s first born to finally let the Jews go free. Even then, after the Jews abandoned the land, Pharaoh gathered his troops to recapture his Jewish slaves - or kill them - only to have his mighty forces drowned in the Sea of Reeds at G-d’s Commandment.

How uniquely parallel to Britain’s unremitting pursuit of the Jews, past, present and planned into the future. When Britain discovered that the population had been contaminated with mad cow disease which turns the brain into a sponge like consistency, the British didn’t see a message in this on-going plague.

Then came the plague of hoof and mouth disease which forced the British to destroy hundreds of thousands of their cattle, leaving the illness lurking, ready to resume its devastation.

Still the British leaders didn’t get the message.

Ordinary Britons, however, speculated why Britain had been struck by what seemed akin to a Biblical plague. But, like Pharaoh, the British leaders like Prime Minister Tony Blair and the Foreign Office (similar to the U.S. State Department) joined forces with such Jew-haters as Yassir Arafat, Bashar Assad of Syria and Iran.

Recently, Blair invited to England the current President of Syria Bashar Assad - known as a leading Terrorist nation, dedicated to the elimination of the Jewish State of Israel. Assad harbors, nurtures, funds, arms and trains at least 10 to 12 different but linked Terrorist organizations. As Bashar Assad stood next to Blair, denying that Syria hosted numerous Terror organizations, Blair just smiled in tacit approval.

At the same time, Jack Straw, Foreign Secretary, dis-invited Israel’s Foreign Minister Bibi Netanyahu when they were supposed to meet and hold joint press conferences. If that were not bad enough, Blair invited representatives of Arafat’s PLO to a meeting wherein "Peace" was to be discussed, even as Arafat’s Al Aksa Brigades took credit for a twin homicidal attack in Tel Aviv, killing at least 22 and maiming more than 100.

London wishes to be listened to by Israel so it convenes an "International Conference" with the Palestinians, Egypt, Jordan and possibly Saudi Arabia but, Israel is NOT invited. Once again, the fate of the Jews is to be decided by a Conference, reminiscent to Hitler’s Wannsee Conference wherein the Nazis decided on their "Final Solution to the Jewish Question". Once again, the hypocritical British establishment has shown its perfidious face when it comes to courting the Arabs while subverting the Jewish State. Well, you can always depend upon the British to be consistent - even if only in its betrayal of Western Allies.

Know this, Blair, while Pharaoh was given 10 plagues to change his ways, you and Britain may only be given two or three before G-d loses patience. It may come as freezing cold, excessive rain, more diseases or a even a cataclysmic earthquake that simply swallows the British Islands into the sea.

The history of the British in its treatment of the Jewish people is indeed rather black: Brutality, confiscation of property, expulsion for 400 years with the connivance of the Church of England. Many high-ranking Brits sympathized and conspired with Hitler’s plans, while others were defecting to Stalin’s KGB. The Brits captured Jews for confinement in concentration camps in Cyprus for trying to escape the graveyards of Europe in deference to Arab interests while allowing hordes of Arabs into Palestine after they set a quota of only 5000 Jews per year while millions of Jews were being massacred in Europe. (1)

Before they abandoned their responsibilities for the British Mandate to make Palestine into the Jewish homeland, the Brits turned their Taggert forts at critical junctions in the new State of Israel over to the Arabs before they retreated. England gave financial and political assistance to Yassir Arafat to further his terrorist goals. All this and much more.

If ever there was an evil Empire in its treatment of Jews, Great Britain is a great example. The Jews were always your litmus test for your humanity - which you consistently failed. Clearly, Great Britain is a place for tourists to avoid, given that "Mad Cow Disease" is still within its food chain - not to mention the plagues yet to come.

It is said that there is always time to repent but, first you must pay the price for the evil you have done. Like Pharaoh, I do hope that you will heed the message or you are likely to pay the ultimate price for your arrogance, hatred and ill-treatment of the Jewish people.

Regrettably, as a nation you were never a great deal different than Nazi Germany or Poland. As we said at the beginning: As in all nations, most of the English do NOT carry the virus of anti-Semitism, however those erstwhile leaders who made the decisions created the White Paper. Lord Halifax (Neville Chamberlain’s foreign secretary 1938-40) was the author of the White Paper which restricted Jewish immigration to a trickle and doomed millions to death was admired Hitler and was a Nazi sympathizer. (2)

Unfortunately, the good often suffer for what the bad do. Perhaps, as in the time of Pharaoh, G-d will be selective and save the righteous amongst you.

                                                       ###

1. "AN OPEN LETTER TO TONY BLAIR & HIS LABOR PARTY: Britain has a history of anti-Semitism & has not yet shaken it off. Their pretense of their innocence doesn’t white-wash their black vest" go to site or read (attached)

2. "THE HATEFUL LEGACY OF THE BRITISH FOREIGN OFFICE" by Avi Davis © WorldNetDaily.com go to: or read (attached)

1. AN OPEN LETTER TO TONY BLAIR AND HIS LABOR PARTY Britain has a history of anti-Semitism and has not yet shaken it off Their pretense of their innocence doesn't white wash their black vest

Read the article below copied from the http://www.palestine-pmc.com/details.asp?cat=1&id=483, (copy below our letter)

UK BYPASSES ISRAELI BAN WITH DECISION TO PROCEED WITH CONFERENCE - PALESTINIAN DELEGATE TO PARTICIPATE VIA PHONE CONFERENCE..

This brings back history the UK with Tony Blair and Chris Patten the EU commissioner cannot white wash, nor ignore.  Are we by any means surprised about the UK's anti-Semitism today, its pro Arab and pro Nazi advocating politics? NO. Since it is in line with their general political style from the past. This brings back memories of the UK Royals even paying court to the Nazis, or just expelling Jews.

In British History we can see a constant trait that was and still to this day is anti-Semitic.

JN Online -- Hard Code Template http://www.detroitjewishnews.com/thismonth/november.cfm We Quote: by Alexis Rubin Special to the Jewish News

Clipstone (England), November 5, 1290 Jews first arrived on English soil several years after William the Conqueror became king in 1066. He allowed them to remain provided they serve only as moneylenders. William then levied steep taxes on the Jews' profits, making clear that their presence in England depended solely on their ability to benefit the royal treasury. In effect, English Jews became indirect conduits for collecting money from the king's non-Jewish subjects, a position that did not endear them to their Christian neighbors.

During King John's rule (1199-1216), popular resentment of the Jewish "usurer" flared into deadly attacks against individual Jews as well as entire Jewish communities. Over the generations English Jewry's economic and social position slowly deteriorated until, on the edge of destitution, they could no longer fill the king's coffers.

On November 5, 1290, John's grandson, King Edward I, expelled all Jews from England. Rather than citing his own rapacious taxation and the Jews' resultant poverty as the reason behind the expulsion order, he blamed the Jews themselves. "Whereas...Jews did...wickedly conspire and contrive a new species of usury...we, in requital of their crimes and for the honor of the Crucified, have banished them from this realm as traitors." Almost 400 years passed before they were permitted to return.

One of the biggest public relations hoaxes ever perpetrated by the British Crown, is that King Edward VIII, who abdicated the throne in 1938, due to his support for the Nazis, was a ``black sheep,'' an aberration in an otherwise unblemished Windsor line.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

The British monarchy, and the City of London's leading Crown bankers, enthusiastically backed Hitler and the Nazis, bankrolled the Fuhrer's election, and did everything possible to build the Nazi war machine, for Britain's planned geopolitical war between Germany and Russia.

Support for Nazi-style genocide has always been at the heart of House of Windsor policy, and long after the abdication of Edward VIII, the Merry Windsors maintained their direct Nazi links.

So, when Prince Philip, co-founder with Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands of the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), tells an interviewer that he hopes to be ``reincarnated as a deadly virus'' to help solve the ``population problem,'' he is just ``doin' what comes naturally'' for any scion of the Anglo-Dutch oligarchy (see page 8 for more quotes from Prince Philip - The Nazi Roots of the House of Windsor ).

To get beyond the soap opera stuff and truly understand the Windsors today, it is useful to start with Prince Philip. Not only was he trained in the Hitler Youth curriculum, but his German brothers-in-law, with whom he lived, all became high-ranking figures in the Nazi Party. Before his family was forced into exile, Prince Philip had been in line of succession to the Greek throne, established after a British-run coup against the son of King Ludwig of Bavaria, who became King Otto I of the Hellenes.

Three of Philip's brothers-in-law were part of a group of German aristocrats who were Anglophile and pro-Nazi at the same time, and who remain a subversive force in Germany to this day.

Prince Bernhard first became interested in the Nazis in 1934, during his last year of study at the University of Berlin.

He was recruited by a member of the Nazi intelligence services, but first worked openly in the motorized SS. Bernhard went to Paris to work for the firm IG Farben, which pioneered Nazi Economics Minister Hjalmar Schacht's slave labor camp system by building concentration camps to convert coal into synthetic gasoline and rubber.
Bernhard's role was to conduct espionage on behalf of the SS. According to the April 5, 1976 issue of Newsweek, this role, as part of a special SS intelligence unit in IG Farbenindustrie, had been revealed in testimony at the Nuremberg trials. When Bernhard left the SS to marry the future Queen Juliana, he signed his letter of resignation to Adolf Hitler, ``Heil Hitler!''
William Hoffman writes in his book Queen Juliana: ``Tensions [over the marriage] were not cooled when ... Adolf Hitler forwarded his own congratulatory message. The newspaper Het Volk editorialized that `it would be better if the future Queen had found a consort in some democratic country rather than in the Third Reich. This is the man who recruited Prince Philip to eco-facism, but Prince Philip's Nazi roots had been laid much earlier.

Although Buckingham Palace's rumor mill has tried to depict this wartime collaboration with the enemy as mere family correspondence, the channel apparently included messages from Prince Philip's secret ally, the Duke of Windsor (the former Edward VIII).

On Nov. 20, 1995, the Washington Times reported, based on recently discovered Portuguese Secret Service files first published in the London Observer, that the Duke of Windsor had been in close collaboration with the Nazis in Spain and Portugal to foment a revolution in wartime Britain, that would topple the Churchill government, depose his brother King George VI, and allow him to regain the throne, with Queen Wallis [Simpson, the American divorcцц©©e, for whom he abdicated the throne] at his side.

Portuguese surveillance revealed that Walter Schellenberg, head of Gestapo counterintelligence, was one point of contact in this plot. After Schellenberg met with the Spanish ambassador to Portugal, Nicols Franco, brother of fascist Gen. Francisco Franco, Ambassador Franco told a Portuguese diplomat: ``The Duke of Windsor, free from the responsibilities of the war, in disagreement with English politicians, could be the man to put at the head of the Empire.''

Whatever correspondence was hidden in Sophie and Prince Christoph's Kronberg Castle, King George VI, in June 1945, felt compelled to dispatch the former MI-5 officer turned ``Surveyor of the King's Pictures,'' Anthony Blunt, to gather up the correspondence. Queen Elizabeth II reportedly insisted that there be no interrogation of Blunt about his secret trip to the castle.

Otherwise, it is notable that starting with an exchange between King George VI and President Eisenhower, the House of Windsor has been desperate to keep classified those documents from Kronberg Castle that fell into American Army hands, long beyond the normal length of time. Clearly, Prince Philip's patron Lord Dickie Mountbatten, Mountbatten's sister Crown Princess Louise, and Philip's brother-in-law Prince Christoph of Hesse were not just exchanging Christmas greetings.

New clues to Edward VIII's 'Nazi links' BBC NEWS | UK | New clues to Edward VIII's 'Nazi links' Excerpts only:

An MP is trying to secure the release of official papers which might shed light on the alleged Nazi sympathies of King Edward VIII. Louise Ellman, MP for Liverpool, Riverside, plans to table Commons questions to the Lord Chancellor's department following new revelations in The Guardian newspaper. It suggests President Roosevelt ordered the FBI to carry out covert surveillance on the exiled former king and his wife, Wallace Simpson - the Duchess of Windsor, while they were holidaying in Florida in 1941.

Ms. Ellman said: "The public has a right to know the truth of what happened in those crucial times of our history and what links existed between the abdicated king and the duchess and the Nazi regime. "There can be no excuse for anyone trying to conceal records of this importance particularly in the light of these latest revelations." It is a matter of the gravest importance." The king was forced into exile in 1936 after he abdicated and was sent firstly to France and then to the Bahamas.

The UK prevented Jews to enter Israel during the worst hours of the Holocaust. Britain, which pursued boats carrying Holocaust survivors, has never changed its attitude towards the Jewish people and the State of Israel.

I would like to add here a little part of our family experience: I tell you what happened during the Nazi times to my own family, that had been refugees from Russia and Poland. My father always worked for an American company.. they had a sister company in the UK. My father was stationed in Berlin.. of all places.. and he asked the US company to get him out please.
This was not any more possible, the American boat was full with their "so called quota system", and visas were not any more issued. So the friends from the American company asked the sister company in the UK to get the family out, which was still possible then.

The UK offered to take my mother and any kids.. but without my father, wanting to break up our family, obviously knowing very well this way they could get around to accept the family. My mother obviously declined.. "if you don't take my husband we all stay".. so we all stayed .. until the American's marched into Berlin ... It was then, that the Americans flew us out, first to Frankfort, then the family made their way to Switzerland. When it was really all over ..... The actual in-between one only can imagine. Including the atrocities experienced by my family.

So, has this anti-Semitism changed in the UK? NO.... it's alive more than ever today. "The self-righteous British know that there is no value to a meeting with Palestinian figures and that these meetings only give legitimacy to continued terror." The British are the hotbed of terrorism, is that a surprise? NO.

The British are interested in economic gains from the Arab countries, not truth and justice. Those who finance the martyrs and terror should be held entirely responsible, and the British Foreign Minister must ask himself the questions that troubled Clinton: Why did Arafat reject the Israeli offer to return almost to the 1967 borders.

The answer is known. The Palestinian leadership wants the destruction of Israel and not peace. Britain, if judged by her past and present behavior, is apparently interested in advancing those aims. "The total destruction of the State of Israel".

The proof: Money from the EU, which Britain is part of, flows with an open hand to The PA Authority that wants to destroy Israelis and Jews, and the Extreme left, which wants to return Israel to indefensible borders.

The UK is helping history again to turn against the Jews. It all started in approx.: November 5, 1290 .... And it's here NOW Just think some 713 years.... Will the UK find their way out of it's disastrous historical track record of anti-Semitism ....?

Ref. article below

Ms. G. Goldwater, Switzerland, Geneva Адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. Для просмотра адреса в вашем браузере должен быть включен Javascript.
Contributing Editor to the TOM MARR Show WCBM, Baltimore, USA http://www.tommarr.com/
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke

A lesson to be learned from all of the Palestinian lies, which the British swallow without any hiccup.
As Abraham Lincoln said: "You can't fool all of the people all of the time"

=============================================================

UK Bypasses Israeli Ban with Decision To Proceed With Conference Palestinian Delegates to Participate Via Phone Conference

11/01/2003 http://www.palestine-pmc.com/details.asp?cat=1&id=483   Palestine Media Center- (PMC) [An official arm of the Palestinian Authority]

Britain said on Friday it will go ahead with a conference on PNA reforms and reviving Middle East peace talks, defying an Israeli decision to ban a Palestinian delegation from traveling to London on January 13 and 14 for the conference. After facing an unyielding Israeli counterpart who refused to overturn the ban on the senior Palestinian officials, UK Prime Minister Tony Blair invited the delegates to attend talks via telephone conference, thereby bypassing Ariel Sharon’s decision.

Israel hurled a series of punishments on the Palestinian people and the PNA after a twin suicide-bombing hit Tel Aviv, rendering 22 people dead. British foreign minister, Jack Straw regretted Israel’s actions, while the European Union criticized the Jewish state and urged it to overturn its decision.

"I regret the Israeli decision to prevent Palestinians from traveling to London to discuss this agenda," Straw said in a statement on Friday, adding that, as a result, the Palestinian officials will participate in talks via telephone conference.

"I am holding a telephone conference on Tuesday with senior members of the Palestinian Authority and Palestinian civil society," Straw added. "The reform agenda matters too much for us to allow it to become stalled. It is vital to the search for peace," he further stressed.

Blair had written to his Israeli counterpart, Sharon urging him to rethink the ban. However, his pleas were futile and the Israeli PM proved unyielding either to British or European pressures. The British PM told Israel the conference would be of benefit to it, as it will deal with PNA reforms called for by the ‘Quartet’ of UN, EU, US and Russian Mideast peace mediators as well as the Jewish state itself. It would also mean a resumption of talks to find a peaceful resolution to the 27-month-old conflict.

An Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman confirmed Friday that his government was determined to uphold the travel ban. "We have heard from Prime Minister Sharon’s office," Blair’s official spokesman said after the Israeli PM upheld his decision to ban delegation from attending the meeting.

"The Israeli position remains unchanged," the spokesman said, adding that Britain was "committed to continuing the process of dialogue with the Palestinians."

The Palestinian representative to the UK, Afif Safieh will attend the conference in person. PNA minister of information and culture Yasser Abed Rabbo, who is also head of the delegation, will be participating via phone conference as will the Minister of planning and international cooperation, Nabil Sha’ath and finance minister, Salam Fayad.

Officials from Jordan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia are to attend the London meeting. "It will have a low-key presence with representatives of the Quartet, representatives of..Egypt, Jordan and if possible Saudi Arabia and then Palestinians already living in London," an EU diplomat told Reuters.

Israeli-British Relations Soaring Blair’s latest attempts to resuscitate the peace process were met with Israeli anger, when the Jewish state was not invited for the London talks.

Israeli media also said Sharon was vexed when Blair refused to meet his foreign minister, Netanyahu, while he agreed to meet with the newly elected Labor party chief-- Sharon’s main rival in upcoming general elections--Amram Mitzna.  Sharon has so far refused to meet Britain’s ambassador to Tel Aviv, Sherard Cowper-Coles, who is to deliver a letter from Blair urging him to overturn the ban.

Straw said the meeting would focus specifically on Palestinian reforms "to help Palestinians prepare for implementation of the road-map leading to statehood in 2005, which was devised by the ‘Quartet’ of peace mediators. "The prime minister (Tony Blair) and I will next week, go ahead with a meeting on Palestinian reform, and discuss with key Palestinians and international partners how to give new momentum to Palestinian reform." Straw emphasized.

Delegates will discuss political, judicial, administrative, economic and constitutional reform.

The foreign minister had previously engaged in a heated discussion with his Israeli counterpart, Benjamin Netanyahu, fueled by the latter publishing extracts of the conversation they had on Monday, which British media saw as an unusual breach of diplomatic etiquette.

Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Jordan Discuss London Meeting Meanwhile, Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Maher consulted Friday with his Saudi and Jordanian counterparts about the London summit, the state MENA news agency said.

Speaking by telephone with his Saudi counterpart Prince Saud al-Faisal and Jordan’s FM Marwan Moasher, Maher discussed "the deterioration of the situation in the occupied Palestinian territories and (British) Prime Minister Tony Blair's invitation to the conference in London," it said.

London has invited Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia to attend the London meeting along with members of the ‘Quartet’."

 2.Avi Davis The hateful legacy of the British Foreign Office This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.  

Russian version