What really happened ten years ago, in Hebron, at the Cave of Machpela
- the Tomb of the Patriarchs - or as the Arabs call it the Ibrahimi Mosque?
The short answer everyone "knows," is that Dr. Baruch Goldstein carried
out a massacre on the Jewish Holiday of Purim, Feb. 25, 1994. But a new
study by Rabbi Dr. Chaim Simons, entitled, "Did or Did Not Dr. Baruch Goldstein
Massacre 29 Arabs?" has just appeared on the Internet, at: http://www.geocities.com/chaimsimons/baruchgoldstein,
for the tenth anniversary of the event. In it, he questions the "common
knowledge" and raises some serious issues that need to be addressed.
Lest one think that Rabbi Dr. Simons is some right-wing crackpot, his
thoroughly researched work of about 150 pages, includes 714 footnotes and
a bibliography of over 150 books, journal and newspaper articles, interviews,
archival records, and quotations from legal sources from Israel, England,
America, Canada, Australia, and Jewish Law.
According to the biographical information on his website, Rabbi Dr.
Simons holds a Bachelor of Science degree with First Class Honors in Chemistry
and Physics from the University of London and a Doctor of Philosophy degree
in Chemistry from the same University. He also holds a Bachelors degree
in Educational Technology. He possesses a Rabbinical Diploma and is a qualified
teacher with decades of experience in education, which includes the setting
and marking of matriculation exams in Israel. Rabbi Dr. Simons has written
a number of books and booklets on a variety of subjects, including "International
Proposals to Transfer Arabs from Palestine 1895-1947: A Historical Survey"
published by KTAV (1988), probably the most thorough academic review of
the issue and also available on his site. So, he's a serious scholar.
Rabbi Dr. Simons, states in the book's dedication, "In the interests
of truth and justice, a Commission of Inquiry should be established - the
composition of which to be acceptable both to the Israeli authorities and
to the Goldstein family - whose sole function would be to determine whether
the killings by Dr. Baruch Goldstein should be classed as a massacre of
Arabs or a pre-emptive strike to prevent a massacre of Jews."
Rabbi Dr. Simons reviews the events leading up to Goldstein's attack.
He raises the issue of Goldstein's prior knowledge of intelligence warnings,
that Arabs planned a massacre of Jews - Goldstein was an emergency doctor
for the Kiryat Arba Terrorist Attack Response Team - to take place that
Purim morning in the Cave of Machpela. He Discusses whether Goldstein "planned"
an attack on Arabs or "responded" to what he saw as the Israeli Army's
indifference to an impending attack on Jews. He questions, "What if a Government
Fails to Act?" and then analyzes the legal status of "Killings Sanctioned
By Law," discussing "killing as an act of self-defense," "killing due to
necessity," and "killing during a war".
Rabbi Dr. Simons concludes that, "The killings by Baruch Goldstein could
possibly come under one of these headings or a combination of two or even
all three." But then stresses "that I do not offer any conclusions on this
question."
Some of the more interesting points Rabbi Dr. Simons makes in his book
include, his description of the near "lynch" atmosphere in the media and
by Israeli government officials just after the incident, describing it
with the value-laden term "massacre," before a full inquiry of the events
could take place. Rabbi Dr. Simons prefers to use the more neutral term
"killing" throughout his work.
Rabbi Dr. Simons works on the assumption that Baruch Goldstein went
out to kill that morning, as did the Shamgar Commission, which shows the
slanted nature of commission's investigation. Several other theories of
what took place that morning exist, that Goldstein was in fact attacked
first and responded in self-defense - the only eyewitnesses are the Arabs
that were involved in the event - that the Israeli Army passively let him
carry out the killings, to avoid the tragedy of an attack on the Jews of
Hebron, or as the Arabs claim, the Israeli Army was involved in the attack
itself. None of these alternatives were investigated by the commission.
Rabbi Dr. Simons takes issue with the workings of the Shamgar Commission
- the commission of inquiry set up to investigate the event - itself. He
points out their refusal to take testimony in multiple instances. He then
shows the biased composition of the commission including a known left-wing
activist and "Peace Now" supporter, Professor Menachem Ya'ari, and an Arab
Judge, Abed el-Rahman Zouabi.
Rabbi Dr. Simons states, "if we study the minutes of the proceedings
of the Shamgar Commission, we can see that three of its five members -
Judge Abed el-Rahman Zouabi, Lieutenant General (res.) Moshe Levy, and
Professor Menachem Ya'ari - were describing Baruch Goldstein as a "murderer"
even before they had heard all the evidence...It was not just a stray remark
by one of the members of the Shamgar Commission. Baruch Goldstein was called
a "murderer" no fewer than 17 times by Judge Zouabi, 6 times by Moshe Levi
and twice by Menachem Ya'ari [at the beginning stages of the hearings]...It
is a cardinal principle of law that a person is innocent until proved guilty.
If a majority of the Commission had already decided that Baruch Goldstein
was a murderer before hearing all of the evidence, then the objectivity
of the section of the Report dealing with Baruch Goldstein is surely put
in doubt!"
The Shamgar Commission's Report was only published in Hebrew and to
help facilitate the international media's reporting on it, the Israeli
Foreign Ministry translated selected excerpts.
Rabbi Dr. Simons also refers to Haggai Segal's article, entitled "A
failure to inform" which appeared in the Israeli newspaper, Jerusalem Post
on July 11, 1994. Segal wrote about the commission's findings, pointing
out facts that the media conveniently ignored. Segal wrote, "The public
doesn't know that the commission charged a key witness from the Wakf [Islamic
Trust] with giving false testimony, expressed an understanding of the motivations
of the Jews in Hebron, indirectly rebuked Yitzchak Rabin, and even mentioned
the purchase of the Cave of the Patriarchs by Abraham from a local merchant...[The
Commission considered that] 'the release of the terrorists [over 1000 in
May 1985] raised tension between the Jewish residents and the Arab population
of the area. Oddly, we didn't hear this quote on the radio. And, wonder
of wonders: it didn't appear in the press. For some reason, but apparently
not by chance, the media have failed to mention the astounding statistics
for Judea
and Samaria [the West Bank] collected by the commission [regarding
the countless attacks by Arabs against Jews]...An additional section, as
yet uncited, verifies the claim of the residents of Kiryat Arba that Goldstein
acted fearing a massacre from the other side...Not even one reporter quoted
the commission's sensational recommendation that the intifada be crushed."
Rabbi Dr. Simons brings another interesting fact to light. Besides the
voluminous testimony of over nine officers from the defense establishment
- to the Shamgar Commission - on their intelligence reports for two and
a half weeks prior to Purim, about a planned Arab attack on the Jews of
Hebron, and the numerous other sources he quotes that corroborate that,
even the mainstream Israeli media reported on the impending danger.
A leaflet was being circulated in Hebron by Hamas, saying that on the
25th or 26th of February - the 25th being Purim - a terrorist attack would
take place in Hebron. This leaflet was referred to in an article in the
newspaper Yediot Aharonot, the morning of February 25th - note, this was
printed before Goldstein's act - which said that the Arab residents of
Hebron were notified by means of leaflets, loudspeakers and inscriptions
on walls to stock up with food in anticipation of a long curfew which would
follow a gigantic attack against the Jews by Hamas. The existence of this
leaflet, which had been circulated in Hebron by Hamas, was also reported
in the Shamgar Commission Report.
Rabbi Dr. Simons informs us that in the week prior to that Purim morning,
there were several incidents of Arab mobs at the Cave of Machpela shouting
"Itbach al-Yahood-Slaughter the Jews!" This included threats to the Jews
there, being spat upon, and struck.
Rabbi Dr. Simons describes an incident that happened five days before
Purim, when a group of 120 Americans went to visit the Cave of Machpela.
Although the soldiers had insisted that Arabs not go into the courtyard
of the Cave whilst the Jews were there, a group of Arabs - between 50 and
100 - succeeded in bursting into the courtyard screaming "Itbach al-Yahood".
At that time, the Jews were peacefully praying the evening service. One
of the Americans present, referred to three other occasions during the
days before Purim - twice on the Sabbath and once on the following Wednesday
- when he visited the Cave of Machpela and was subjected to Arab rioting,
insults and, on two of these occasions, the yelling of "Itbach al-Yahood."
He added that on each visit he was personally threatened and struck by
Arabs. He wrote a letter to the Jerusalem Post about his experiences -
that was published - and a Bar-Ilan University professor submitted the
"letter to the editor" in a letter to the
commission. The Shamgar Commission did not invite the American
who was attacked, to give evidence.
Other elements of the picture that Rabbi Dr. Simons informs us about
include, that the metal detector at the East Gate where most of the Arabs
entered that Friday Purim morning, was damaged the night before. That an
unusually large number of Arabs came to the Machpela that Friday - some
500 men and 300 women - only a handful of the men were searched, but not
one of the women. And that after the Goldstein incident, three automatic
weapons were found in the Machpela - other than Goldstein's weapon - including
one wrapped in an Arab Keffiya (scarf). All these elements, point to a
planned attack on the Jews at the Cave of Machpela that Purim morning.
Rabbi Dr. Simons also raises the issues of how Baruch Goldstein died
and asks why haven't the Arabs involved in his murder been prosecuted.
He points out that the pathologist's report says that numerous blows to
the head, from all directions - from long blunt instruments - caused Goldstein's
death. It also speaks of a smashed in skull, damage to the brain, broken
ribs and a broken left arm. In her evidence to the Shamgar Commission,
Goldstein's widow, Miriam, said that the face was so mutilated that even
Baruch's brother had difficulty in identifying him.
Rabbi Dr. Simons then asks, "Why was the body in such a state? Did the
Arabs have to do all this as an act of self-defense?" He states "the answer
can be found in statements made by Arabs who were in the Isaac Hall at
the time."
According to Rabbi Dr. Simons, a Muslim worshipper, Awad Abu-S'nina,
present in the Machpela, testified to B'Tzelem - an organization that describes
itself as "The Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied
Territories" - that while Goldstein was changing the magazine in his rifle,
Awad grabbed the weapon and immediately his father, Ayub Abu-S'nina, took
the weapon from him and threw it aside. B'Tzelem's report was handed over
to the Shamgar Commission
Rabbi Dr. Simons continues, when questioned by the police, another Muslim
worshipper, Al-Mutlab Natshe, described how about ten Arabs then fell on
Goldstein, knocked him onto the ground and beat him to death with metal
poles. A 12-year-old boy, Ala S'eid Ali Ashur, stated that a large number
of Arabs beat Goldstein with a fire extinguisher and the metal poles from
the room dividers. Another Muslim worshipper, Ashraf Karaki told the police
that he saw Baruch Goldstein lying dead on the floor with a lot of blood
on his neck and head and he also saw a large metal pole on his body and
a large number of similar type poles around him.
Testimony also comes from Israeli Army Private Avihai Zahala, who saw
over the closed-circuit television system operating in the Cave of Machpela,
that after the shooting ended, about three Arabs with metal poles going
towards the area of the Hall where Goldstein was killed.
Rabbi Dr. Simons then concludes, "From all this we can see that Baruch
Goldstein was beaten to death after his rifle had been taken from him.
This fact is confirmed in two places in the Shamgar Report, and this Report
specifically states that this was done by Moslem worshippers. Furthermore,
the official death certificate issued by the Israeli Ministry of the Interior,
states the cause of death as murder."
The police investigated the murder of Baruch Goldstein and by December
1994, they reached the conclusion that he had been murdered in cold blood
by Muslim worshippers after his weapon had been taken away.
One of the Arabs present that Purim in the cave of Machpela was a collaborator
with the Israeli authorities. This collaborator knows the names of the
Arabs who murdered Baruch Goldstein and also to which organization they
belong.
But State Attorney Dorit Benish - later appointed a judge to the Israeli
Supreme Court - decided not to open criminal proceedings against the Arabs
who were accused of murdering Baruch Goldstein. In June 1995, the Legal
Adviser to the Government, Michael Ben-Yair endorsed Benish's decision.
Rabbi Dr. Simons points out that, "To date, no Arab has been charged
with Baruch Goldstein's murder. This can be contrasted with the case of
a Jewish settler, Yoram Skolnik, who killed an Arab terrorist after he
had been disarmed. Skolnik was immediately arrested, charged, brought to
trial and sentenced to life imprisonment for murder. Later, President Ezer
Weizman reduced Skolnik's sentence first to 15 years and then to 11 years.
After serving 7 years, a parole board followed standard practice and took
off one third of his remaining sentence for good behavior. This did not
find favor with Meretz Knesset Member Zahava Galon who challenged the parole
board's decision in the High Court, who then ruled that this decision was
unacceptable. Yoram Skolnik thus remained in jail. To the best of my knowledge,
Zahava Galon has never challenged the fact that the Arabs who murdered
Baruch Goldstein have never been brought to trial!"
Why haven't they? In a democracy, the law should be applied equally.
As with most good research, Rabbi Dr. Simons raises many more questions
than he answers. Although, I must tell you, he does quite a job of informing
one of the facts, relating to before, during, and after the Goldstein incident.
With the rise of vicious, unrelenting Arab terror against Jews in Israel
these last few years, the events of the past take on new shades of meaning.
I feel Rabbi Dr. Simons' book sheds new light on the Goldstein incident,
and is well worth reading for those who seek the truth about what really
happened and it's surrounding circumstances.
In conclusion, I want to point out that Rabbi Dr. Simons states, "I
myself wish to stress that I strongly deplore and condemn any form of killing
of innocent people whether Jewish or non-Jewish, not sanctioned by law,
or indeed any form of injury or harassment of such people not sanctioned
by law. However, I can pass no judgment on Dr. Baruch Goldstein since the
incident has never been adjudicated. As was quite rightly repeatedly pointed
out when a number of prominent people were being accused of various crimes,
one can criticize or condemn their actions only after a court of law has
found them guilty..."
Ariel Natan Pasko is an independent analyst & consultant. He has
a Master's Degree in International Relations & Policy Analysis.
His articles appear regularly on numerous news/views and think-tank websites,
in newspapers, and can be read at: www.geocities.com/ariel_natan_pasko
Would you believe that the undersigned has anything in common with
-- Professor Victor Davis Hanson (Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University), -- Dr Charles Krauthammer, (Washington Post, Time, The Weekly Standard), -- Caroline Glick (Deputy Managing Editor of the Jerusalem Post), -- Jonathan Tobin (Executive Editor of the Philadelphia Jewish Exponent).
Amazingly, the editors of the MAOF website decided that the missives of the undersigned are worthy of translation and posting along the articles written by these distinguished authors.
The first letter was published without the consent of the undersigned. However, after thorough examination of the laudable attitude of MAOF and of the excellent contents of the website, the undersigned had most graciously granted his permission for publication of his missives in both English and Russian.
“Analytical Group MAOF” [1] is an organisation founded about ten years ago by Russian-speaking Jewish intellectuals. The attitude of MAOF is definitely pro-Zionist -- unambiguously and unapologetically.
One of MAOF’s primary purposes is providing information and analysis about Middle-Eastern and world affairs as well as about Israel’s history, values and dilemmas. In addition to extensive publication activity in various media, MAOF also organises excursions and seminars. While the vast majority of the contents of the MAOF website is in Russian, texts originally written in English are provided in the original [2] as well as in Russian.
There are arguably about 250 millions of Russian-speakers worldwide and many of them do not read English. The indisputable motivation for the author’s permission was to grant those millions of disadvantaged people the grand benefit of reading the author’s ruminations. If the author is ever maliciously accused that his tacit motivation for authorising the publication was his craving to be listed along with the above-mentioned distinguished writers, his plea will definitely be “nolo contendere”.
The editors of MAOF expressed their gratitude by granting the undersigned a privilege that no other author got – the opportunity to review and correct the Russian translation before publication. The original letters of the undersigned are at [3] and their Russian version is at [4]. At of today, only two letters are posted but several other letters are pending translation.
You are kindly ENCOURAGED TO RECOMMEND the MAOF website to your friends and colleagues worldwide, particularly those who speak Russian. Those who do not enjoy the benefit of proficiency in the exquisite Russian language can find many thought-provoking and inspiring articles about Middle-Eastern and world affairs in the English section [2].